Did Apple’s CEO Forego $75 million as a Matter of Principle?

There’s tone at the top, and then there’s tone at the top of the top. And when it comes to defining “top,” it’s hard to beat being the highest-paid CEO in the world, leading the most valuable company in the world. The man who occupies that post, of course, is Apple Inc.’s Tim Cook.

And recently, Cook made a pretty big move that might well do something to set the tone among high-end CEO’s. According to SEC filings, Cook reportedly has opted to take a pass on dividends he could have collected on over a million unvested shares. In total, that amounts to passing up about $75 million. Not that this is exactly going to leave Cook in the poorhouse — he’s paid a mind-boggling amount of money for the task of trying to fill Steve Jobs’s shoes. But still, it’s not trivial either. What should we make of it?

There are a couple of ways to think about this.

One has to do with shareholder confidence. Some have suggested that the decision is designed to show that Apple’s recent decision to pay a dividend wasn’t intended to benefit Cook himself. It is good for the investing public to know that the company is making decisions about things like dividends with the the best interest of shareholders in mind, rather than the best interests of the CEO. But then, Apple isn’t exactly suffering a crisis of shareholder confidence. If boosting the image of the company’s leadership is what you’re looking for, this might just be overkill.

But there’s another way to think of this, and that has to do with the good old-fashioned notion of honour. Call me a hopeless romantic, but I like to think that Cook’s decision might have something to do, as an unnamed source told the Telegraph, with setting an example for his fellow CEOs. Executive compensation has been in the spotlight almost continually for the last couple of years, and has even been the focal point of shareholder revolts. Maybe this is Cook’s way of saying, look, a high-end CEO doesn’t always have to squeeze every penny he can out of the company. And it’s entirely plausible, I think, that someone like Cook might make that decision — and send that signal — as a matter of principle.

“Honour” is the right moral category, here, because foregoing the cash is not something Cook is ethically obligated to do. He is fully within his rights, both legally and ethically, to take the dividend like other shareholders. But there’s arguably something good, something admirable, about attempting to shift the tone among high-end CEOs this way. It’s one thing to say that CEOs are overpaid. It’s quite another to set an example.

Will Cook’s move have any impact? Who knows. But it does seem like one more interesting attempt by the folks in Cupertino to get someone to “Think Different.”

3 comments so far

  1. Constant Geographer on

    Huh. Maybe people lose sight of the fact he is passing up dividends. Many CEOs of late state “I won’t take any salary this year,” or they state “I will only take $1 in salary this year.” Empty gesture considering the amount of stocks and income from investments.

    Now, for Tim Cook to offer up his investments – perhaps he will establish a new direction for those CEOs rewarded with seemingly exorbitant salaries.

    • Chris MacDonald on

      I agree. Steve Jobs was a $1 man for a while, but he did very, very well on stock options as I recall. Cook’s move amounts to giving up real money.

      • Ivonne Reilly on

        I believe the CEO’s ethics represent the company ethics at large. Thus, what Cook is doing is registering his code of ethics to every single tier of managers and employees within his company. And time will tell about the transformations this measure will accomplish for the corporation giant.
        In a world exposed to eyes vigilant 24/7 and social media , this gesture will represent more money to Apple and undoubtedly will benefit Cook in the long run in salaries.
        A refreshing change for corporate America after the Eron and bailouts scenarios…at last APPLE’s CEO is giving up from himself , instead of taking for himself. It is remarkable!.My hunch is that this is a very thoughtful move in the chess board, …and we should keep close eyes on him to see his next move in new era of CEO’s ethics.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: